expense ratio

106 articles
The Motley FoolThe Motley Fool··Todd Shriber

Schwab's International Small-Cap ETF Offers Cheap Diversification With Lower Risk

$SCHC offers diversified international small-cap exposure with 0.08% fees, 2,262 holdings, lower volatility, and better risk-adjusted returns than domestic alternatives.
SCHCrisk-adjusted returnsETF
The Motley FoolThe Motley Fool··Matt Frankel, Cfp

VSS Offers Cheap Ticket to Global Small-Caps With 0.06% Fee

Vanguard's $VSS ETF provides broad international small-cap exposure at 1.6x book value—significantly cheaper than U.S. peers—with ultra-low fees.
VSSemerging marketsvaluation
The Motley FoolThe Motley Fool··Ben Gran

VYMI Outshines NOBL: International Diversification Wins Dividend ETF Race

VYMI edges NOBL with lower costs, broader diversification, and higher yields, though both lag S&P 500 performance.
VYMINOBLdividend yielddiversification
The Motley FoolThe Motley Fool··Dominic Basulto

Morgan Stanley Launches Ultra-Low-Cost Bitcoin ETF, Disrupting $100B Market

Morgan Stanley debuts spot Bitcoin ETF with industry-leading 0.14% fee, undercutting iShares to become cheapest option available.
GSGSpAGSpCGSpDMS+11expense ratiocryptocurrency investment
The Motley FoolThe Motley Fool··Robert Izquierdo

Corporate Bonds Beat Treasuries: State Street's SPLB Outpaces iShares TLT

State Street's SPLB corporate bond ETF outperforms iShares TLT Treasury bonds with 8.8% vs 4.0% returns and higher yields, offering compelling value for income investors.
TLTSPLBdividend yieldincome investing
The Motley FoolThe Motley Fool··Robert Izquierdo

Mega-Cap vs. Small-Cap: Vanguard's MGK and iShares' IWO Face Off

Vanguard's MGK offers ultra-low costs and mega-cap tech exposure, while iShares' IWO provides diversified small-cap growth at higher fees—each suits different investor profiles.
NVDAMSFTAAPLMGKIWOportfolio diversificationinvestment strategy
The Motley FoolThe Motley Fool··Sara Appino

QQQ vs. IWO: Megacap Tech Dominance Proves Superior to Small-Cap Diversification

QQQ and IWO offer contrasting growth strategies. QQQ's 102 large-cap tech holdings delivered stronger five-year returns, while IWO's 1,100+ small-cap stocks provided comparable one-year gains with higher volatility.
QQQNVDAMSFTAAPLIWOportfolio diversificationgrowth stocks
The Motley FoolThe Motley Fool··Robert Izquierdo

SCHQ vs. SPLB: Comparing Schwab and State Street's Ultra-Low-Cost Bond ETFs

SPLB outperforms SCHQ over five years ($926 vs. $774), offering 5.38% yield from 3,000+ corporate bonds. SCHQ prioritizes safety with 0.03% fees and Treasury-only exposure.
SPLBportfolio diversificationdividend yield
The Motley FoolThe Motley Fool··Reuben Gregg Brewer

New AI ETF Struggles to Differentiate as $112M Xtrackers Fund Arrives Late

Xtrackers' new AI ETF launches with modest assets and standard fees, offering little distinction from established competitors in crowded sector.
AIQXAIXexpense ratioassets under management
The Motley FoolThe Motley Fool··Sarah Sidlow

Bitcoin ETF Showdown: FBTC's Scale vs. HODL's Fee Advantage

FBTC commands $12.7B in AUM with 0.25% fees; HODL offers $1.2B with 0.2% fees (waived through 2026). Both track Bitcoin identically.
FBTCHODLliquidityexpense ratio
The Motley FoolThe Motley Fool··Sarah Sidlow

IBIT vs. FBTC: How Two Bitcoin ETF Giants Stack Up in a Crowded Market

BlackRock's IBIT and Fidelity's FBTC dominate Bitcoin ETF space with identical 0.25% fees and 12.6% returns, though IBIT's $57.64B AUM dwarfs FBTC's $12.7B, with custody differences their primary distinction.
COINIBITFBTCexpense ratioassets under management
The Motley FoolThe Motley Fool··Ben Gran

Leveraged S&P 500 ETF's Million-Dollar Promise Comes With Steep Risks

ProShares Ultra S&P 500 ($SSO) offers 14.5% average annual returns but amplifies losses. Year-to-date decline of 9% versus 3.8% for standard S&P 500 raises questions about long-term viability.
SSOS&P 500long-term investing
The Motley FoolThe Motley Fool··Robert Izquierdo

FIGB vs. IEI: How Fidelity and iShares Diverge on Bond ETF Strategy

Fidelity's FIGB offers higher yields but more risk; iShares' IEI prioritizes safety with Treasury bonds and lower costs for conservative investors.
IEIFIGBrisk managementportfolio diversification
The Motley FoolThe Motley Fool··Robert Izquierdo

Vanguard's Bond ETF Showdown: BND vs. VGIT—Which Fits Your Portfolio?

Vanguard's BND and VGIT both charge 0.03% fees but serve different needs: BND offers diversified investment-grade bonds with higher yields; VGIT provides Treasury-only exposure with lower volatility.
BNDVGITportfolio diversificationdividend yield
The Motley FoolThe Motley Fool··Eric Trie

VOO vs. QQQ: Broad Market Stability or Concentrated Tech Growth?

VOO offers broad S&P 500 exposure at 0.03% cost with lower volatility; QQQ concentrates on mega-cap tech with higher fees but stronger five-year returns despite greater downside risk.
QQQNVDAMSFTAAPLVOOS&P 500portfolio diversification
The Motley FoolThe Motley Fool··Andy Gould

Gold vs. Silver Mining ETFs: GDX and SLVP Diverge on Yields, Volatility

SLVP outpaces GDX on one-year returns and yields, while GDX offers greater stability and superior five-year performance. Choice depends on risk tolerance.
GDXSLVPportfolio diversificationdividend yield
The Motley FoolThe Motley Fool··Katie Brockman

XLP vs. IYK: Consumer Staples ETFs Battle Over Fees and Diversification

XLP and IYK both offer consumer staples exposure with similar yields, but XLP charges lower fees and outperforms, while IYK provides broader diversification at higher cost.
WMTCOSTPGXLPIYKportfolio diversificationdividend yield
The Motley FoolThe Motley Fool··Seena Hassouna

FSTA vs. RSPS: Choosing Your Consumer Staples ETF Strategy

FSTA and RSPS offer divergent consumer staples strategies: FSTA emphasizes low fees (0.08%) and mega-cap concentration with stronger returns, while RSPS pursues equal-weighting and higher income (2.9% yield) at higher cost.
WMTCOSTPGFSTARSPSdividend yieldportfolio concentration
The Motley FoolThe Motley Fool··Andy Gould

XLP vs. PBJ: Which Consumer Staples ETF Wins for Income and Growth?

$XLP offers lower fees (0.08%) and higher dividend yield (2.4%) versus $PBJ, while $PBJ shows recent outperformance. $XLP better suits most long-term investors.
WMTCOSTKRPGXLP+1food and beveragedividend yield
The Motley FoolThe Motley Fool··Andy Gould

VDC's Lower Costs Trump PBJ's Returns: A Staples ETF Showdown

Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF ($VDC) offers lower fees and broader diversification than Invesco Food & Beverage ETF ($PBJ), making it the preferred choice for most investors despite PBJ's stronger 1-year returns.
WMTCOSTKRPGVDC+1food and beveragedividend yield